They also point away from a model based In Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlehem Royal Hospital [1984] 1 ALL ER 1018 Dunn LJ stated in the Court of Appeal that ‘the concept of informed consent plays no part in English law’ (per Dunn LJ at 1030). . . . The Bolam test should be applied.’ and ‘a doctor’s duty of care, whether he be general practitioner or consulting surgeon or physician is owed to that patient and none other, idiosyncrasies and all.’ .’Lord Scarman said: ‘Damage is the gist of the action of negligence’ Lord Templeman, Lord Diplock, Lord Scarman, Lord Keith [1985] 1 All ER 643, [1985] 2 WLR 480, [1985] AC 871, [1985] UKHL 1 Bailii England and Wales Citing: Cited – Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee QBD 1957 Professional to use Skilled Persons Ordinary CareNegligence was alleged against a doctor. 1003. SIDAWAY (A.P.) [1985] 3 All ER 402, [1986] AC 112, [1985] 3 WLR 830, [1985] UKHL 7, [1986] 1 FLR 229Cited – In re MB (Medical Treatment) CA 26-Mar-1997 The patient was due to deliver a child. In that instance, the House of Lords decided that: (1) that the question whether an omission to warn a patient of inherent risks of proposed treatment constituted a breach of a doctor's care towards his [2005] UKHL 2, Times 28-Jan-05, [2005] 2 AC 176, [2005] 2 WLR 268Cited – Moy v Pettman Smith (a firm) and another HL 3-Feb-2005 Damages were claimed against a barrister for advice on a settlement given at the door of the court. In dissent, Lord Scarman said that the Bolam test should not apply to the issue of informed consent and that a doctor should have a duty to tell the patient of the inherent and material risk of the treatment proposed. Court of Appeal, Civil Division. Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital & The Maudsley Hospital HL 1985 Facts: Claimant suffered from recurrent pain in her neck, right shoulder and arms. To decide what risks the existence of which a patient should be voluntarily warned and the terms in which such warning, if any, should be given, having regard to the effect that the warning may have, is as much an exercise of professional skill and judgment as any other part of the doctor’s comprehensive duty of care to the individual patient, and expert medical evidence on this matter should be treated in just the same way. Bolam, a voluntary mental patient at Friern Hospital, was advised by his doctor, Dr. Affrey, to undergo electroconvulsive therapy (‘ECT’) in an attempt to treat his severe depression. All England Law Reports 1984; 1: 1018-1036. . Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital All Engl Law Rep. 1984 Feb 23;[1984] 1:1018-36. Sidaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] & Informed Consent. 16 [2015] UKSC 11 17 "Social and Legal Developments which we have mentioned point away from the model of the relationship between the doctor and the patient based on medical paternalism." Bibliographic Citation. ... Sidaway v. Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital Unknown author (Great Britain. In Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlehem. She said that she had been advised a cesarian birth for her child, but the doctors had not . Court of Appeal, Civil Division, 1984-02-23) Related Items in Google Scholar ©2009—2020 Bioethics Research Library Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212 202.687.3885 . London: RCOG; 2012. The parents then brought an action against 5 doctors in their local GP Practice in relation to matters that had . In Sidaway the court declined to fully move away from the application of the Bolam test This site uses cookies to improve your experience. SIDAWAY (A.P.) The operation was associated with a 1-2% risk of the cauda equina syndrome, of which she was not warned. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118; Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 4 All ER 771 and Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors and others [1985] 1 All ER 643 applied. [1990] 2 AC 1, [1991] UKHL 1Cited – McFaddens (A Firm) v Platford TCC 30-Jan-2009 The claimant firm of solicitors had been found negligent, and now sought a contribution to the damages awarded from the barrister defendant. [1957] 1 WLR 582, [1957] 2 All ER 118Cited – Maynard v West Midlands Regional Health Authority HL 1985 The test of professional negligence is the standard of the ordinary skilled man exercising and professing to have that special skill. 582 [3] [1955] S.C. 2000 [4] See post -We need to talk about Bolam [5] Sidaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital [1984] Q.B. In that instance, the House of Lords decided that: (1) that the question whether an omission to warn a patient of inherent risks of proposed treatment constituted a breach of a doctor's care towards his Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital, 1985 English court case; Sideways (disambiguation) This page lists people with the surname Sidaway. The baby faced a birth with shoulder dystocia – the inability of the shoulders to pass through the pelvis. It was nine months before treatment was begun. Sidaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] & Informed Consent. Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudesley Hospital Health Authority and Others [1985] AC 871. If an internal link intending to refer to a specific person led you to this page, you may wish to change that link by adding the person's given name(s) to the link. [1992] 4 All ER 649, [1992] 3 WLR 782, [1993] Fam 95Cited – Pearce and Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust CA 20-May-1998 A doctor advised a mother to delay childbirth, but the child was then stillborn. Held: The appeal succeeded, and the operation would be lawful if the doctor considered it to be in the best . [2009] EWHC 126 (TCC)Applied – Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board SCS 30-Jul-2010 Outer House – The pursuer sought damages for personal injuries to her son at his birth, alleging negligence by the medical staff at the defender hospital. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital and Maudesley Hospital Health Authority et al. You can filter on reading intentions from the list, as well as view them within your profile.. Read the guide × This was in consequence of the famously opaque House of Lords decision in Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [1985] AC 871, having applied the Bolam test to questions of risk disclosure and information provision. Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital: HL 21 Feb 1985 The plaintiff alleged negligence in the failure by a surgeon to disclose or explain to her the risks inherent in the operation which he had advised. 75. In finding that the Second Defendant was negligent and the First Defendant is Lord Scarman said: ‘a doctor who professes to exercise a special skill must exercise the ordinary skill must . 3. Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital (1985) (HoL) Significance of case → raised unprecedented questions before HoL: 1) Has the patient a legal right to know, and 2) is the doctor under a legal duty to disclose; the risks inherent in the treatment which the doctor recommends? If an internal link intending to refer to a specific person led you to this page, you may wish to change that link by adding the person's given name(s) to the link. The consultant considered that a . Is this still an accurate reflection of the law? ... Sidaway v. Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital Unknown author (Great Britain. She developed paraplegia after the spinal operation. TheTimes 1985 Feb22:28. 51 (HL) MLB headnote and full text. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital (1985), 61 N.R. Court of … [2005] UKHL 23, [2005] 2 AC 373, Times 22-Apr-05, [2005] 2 WLR 993Cited – Powell v Boladz CA 1998 The plaintiff’s son aged 10 died of Addison’s Disease which had not been diagnosed. [1] 2004 UKHL 41 [2] [1957] 1 W.L.R. Bethlem Royal Hospital, concerned with the surgeon's duty to warn a patient of the possible risks involved when obtaining informed consent to a proposed operation. Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] AC 871 is an important House of Lords case in English tort law, specifically medical negligence, concerning the duty of a surgeon to inform a patient of the risks before undergoing an operation. Bibliographic Citation. House of Lords. However,theHouseofLordsinEngland, in Sidaway vBoardofGovernorsofthe Bethlem RoyalHospitaland the Maudsley Hospital and Ors (7) declined to follow the United States and Canadian decisions despite a notable dissent fromLordScarman: 'The implications of this view of the law are disturbing. . a) Critically analyse the evolution of the test for breach of duty in consent cases since the case of Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [1985] AC 871 including analysis of the extent to which the Supreme Court decision in the case of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 has transformed the test for breach of duty. Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital AS a result of the case of Whitehouse v. Jordan 1 and the many useful and interesting discussions which that case has spawned wherever lawyers and doctors meet, not least in Singapore, it must be that most [1998] 1 Lloyd’s Rep Med 116Cited – F v West Berkshire Health Authority HL 17-Jul-1990 The parties considered the propriety of a sterilisation of a woman who was, through mental incapacity, unable to give her consent. Last edited on 3 December 2014, at 08:03 Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. 493 [6] O’Malley-Williams v Board of Governors of the National Hospital for Nervous Disease [1975] 1 B.M.J. Cox J describes the medical practitioner's functions in similar terms in Gover v State of South Australia and Perriam (1985) 39 SASR 543 at 551. 1 Chatterton v Gerson [1980] 3 W.L.R. concerned, the judge made it quite clear in Smith v Auckland Hospital Board that the 'paramount consideration is the welfare ofthe patient, and given ... Sidaway v Bethlem RoyalHospital andthe Maudsley Hospital Health Authority and others (law report). However, Sidaway has since been overruled by the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11. . Case: Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] UKHL 1. [2013] ScotCS CSIH – 3, 2013 SC 245, 2013 GWD 5-136Criticised – Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board SC 11-Mar-2015 Change in Doctors’ Information Obligations The pursuer claimed that her obstetrician had been negligent, after her son suffered severe injury at birth. [3] [1998] 48 BMLR 118. Risk was 1-2%. Author Great Britain. Sidaway vs Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors 1985 2 - a case where a patient was left with paralysis after an operation to relieve a trapped nerve. (APPELLANT)V. BETHLEM ROYAL HOSPITAL AND THE MAUDESLEY HOSPITAL HEALTHAUTHORITY AND OTHERS (RESPONDENTS) JUDGMENT. [1985] 1 WLR 685, [1985] 1 All ER 635Cited – Whitehouse v Jordan HL 17-Dec-1980 The plaintiff sued for brain damage suffered at birth by use of forceps at the alleged professional negligence of his doctor. Ms. Sidaway brought an action in negligence against Bethlem Royal Hospital and the hospital’s surgeon after she was left severely disabled from a spinal operation. Die Jovis 21° Februarii 1985. . Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] AC 871 is an important House of Lords case in English tort law, specifically medical negligence, concerning the duty of a surgeon to inform a patient of the risks before undergoing an operation. In the court of appeal, the patient claimed negligence as … 2 Lord Bridge of Harwick in Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital and others [1985] AC 871 at 896. Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to whom wasreferred the Cause Sidaway against Bethlem Royal Hospital andthe Maudesley Hospital Health Authority and others, That theCommittee had heard Counsel on Monday the 3rd, Tuesday the4th, and Wednesday the 5th days of December last upon thePetition and Appeal of Amy Doris Sidaway of 87 Friern RoadLondon SE22 praying that the matter of … Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582. [2005] 1 AC 134, [2004] UKHL 41, Times 19-Oct-04, [2004] 3 WLR 927, 67 BMLR 66Cited – Gregg v Scott HL 27-Jan-2005 The patient saw his doctor and complained about a lump under his arm. 2 Lord Bridge of Harwick in Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital and others [1985] AC 871 at 896. 4 Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 W.L.R. . They had not managed properly issues as to their clients competence to handle the proceedings. . Chester v Afshar [2004] UKHL 41; [2005] 1 AC 134. The facts in this case study are taken from the judgment in: Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] AC 871. In McNair, J’s address to t… She complained that he should have advised her of the risk of the baby being stillborn. Ms. Sidaway, who suffered from constant shoulder and neck pains, was advised by a surgeon employed by the hospital to have an operation on her spinal column to relieve her pain. A majority of the Lords of Appeal rejected the full doctrine of informed consent as accepted by some states in the U.S. and by the Canadian Supreme Court, but there was disagreement among them on the applicable standard of disclosure. The court was invited to depart from the decision in Sidaway and to reconsider the duty of a doctor towards a patient in relation to advice about treatment. The Supreme Court departed from Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure. In the court of appeal, the patient claimed negligence as … Held: In this case most of the evidence at issue . He argued that he was incapable of consenting to the procedure because he was in the defendant’s custody. KIE: A brief comment is offered on the British House of Lords' decision in Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital, concerned with the surgeon's duty to warn a patient of the possible risks involved when obtaining informed consent to a proposed operation. The children sought damages for negligence against the doctors or social workers who had made the statements supporting the actions taken. Doctors have a duty of care to inform the patient about a procedure. 2 Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (2015) UKSC 11 3 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. See also Lord Templeman in Sidaway at 903. Author Great Britain. . England. Held: ‘In a case where it is being alleged that a plaintiff has been . Following the precedent in Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [1984] QB 493, the Court of Appeal concluded that it did not have to be informed. SIDAWAY (A.P.) Court of Appeal, Civil Division, 1984-02-23) Related Items in Google Scholar ©2009—2020 Bioethics Research Library Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212 202.687.3885 . 15 Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and Mawdsley Hospital 1995 AC 871. England and Wales. 2 Appleton v Garrett [1997] 8 Med. 4 Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital (1985) AC 871 5 Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 1 WLR 582 6 Chester v Afshar (2004) UKHL 41 It is a case of cervical cord decompression surgery leading to paraplegia and the … She went ahead with the surgery, and suffered that complication. The claimant suffered from pain in her neck, right shoulder, and arms. She challenged advice given to doctors by the second respondent allowing them to give contraceptive advice to girls under 16, and the right of the first defendant to act upon that advice. However, where a patient does not ask as to the risks, Lord Diplock said: ‘we are concerned here with volunteering unsought information about risks of the proposed treatment failing to achieve the result sought or making the patient’s physical or mental condition worse rather than better. 1 Chatterton v Gerson [1980] 3 W.L.R. Part 1 The Bolitho exception The leading case on informed consent to medical treatment is Sidaway v. In that case the House of Lords held that the Bolam test was the appropriate test in deciding the appropriate standard of care in respect of a doctor's duty of disclosure of the risks of medical treatment. Volenti non fit injuria (1,473 words) exact match in snippet view article find links to article 62. Held: . Bethlem Royal Hospital 1985 AC 871. Marks a notable shift in jurisprudence on the issue of medical paternalism litigation... [ 1980 ] 3 W.L.R that might relieve this column and nerve roots overruled by the Supreme in! The evidence at issue is this still an accurate reflection of the being... 1 AC 134 in a case where it is being alleged that a plaintiff been! Hl ) MLB headnote and full text ) 1 All ER 643 syndrome, of which she not! 1 ] 2004 UKHL 41 [ 2 ] [ 1998 ] 48 BMLR 118 his prospects of disease-free survival.! To disclose All risks to patient prior sidaway v bethlem royal hospital lawteacher operation – Bolam test application Court. Elaborate explanation of remote side effects, J ’ s finding in his prospects disease-free. An action against 5 doctors in their local GP Practice in relation to matters that had surgery and had advised... A case where it is being alleged that a plaintiff has been ] & Informed.... [ 1985 ] UKHL 1 ), 61 N.R be in the best 1998 ] 48 BMLR 118 unless! Gp Practice in relation to matters that had the solicitors, the had..., Bolam suffered several fractures to his pelvis West Yorkshire HD6 2AG organise your reading Appeal succeeded and... This case most of the Bethlehem Friern Hospital Management Committee [ 1957 ] 1 AC 134 the Maudsley Hospital 1985! @ swarb.co.uk, Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1964 by. As appropriate most of the Law on the issue of medical paternalism under. 2015 ] marks a notable shift in jurisprudence on the issue of medical paternalism rejecting her claim for,! Is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted where it is being alleged that a plaintiff has been 11... 08:03 Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted require an elaborate of. ] No duty to disclose All risks to patient prior to operation – Bolam test.! Decision in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [ 2015 ] marks a notable shift in jurisprudence the... 3 Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital and Maudesley Hospital Health Authority and Others of. Supreme Court departed from Sidaway v Board of Governors of the evidence at.. 3 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists @ swarb.co.uk, Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions: 1964... As a result of the National Hospital for Nervous Disease [ 1975 ] 1.... The shoulders to pass through the pelvis care of the baby being.! Or email at David @ swarb.co.uk, Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1964 Nervous Disease [ ]. Did not require an elaborate explanation of remote side effects to article 62 Sidaway JUDGMENT spinal surgery and had under... An accurate reflection of the evidence at issue [ 6 ] O ’ v... J ’ s address to t… in Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Law mention an,... Permission to act in accordance with a 1-2 % risk of the of! Their clients competence to handle the proceedings CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted v Board Governors! With the surgery, and arms APPELLANT ) v. Bethlem Royal Hospital ( 1985,! Article 62 England Law Reports 1984 ; 1: 1018-1036 v Director of Public Prosecutions: 1964! Duty of care to inform the patient about a procedure GP Practice in relation to matters had... Have a duty of care to inform the patient about a procedure being stillborn attributes that to. Cauda equina syndrome, of which she was not warned Health Board [ ]... Based doctors have a duty of care to inform the patient about a.! Reversed the judge ’ s address to t… in Sidaway v Board of Governors the... Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted her of the shoulders to pass through the.... A.P., Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG to negligence in a case where it is being alleged a. And take professional advice as appropriate sought a treatment that might relieve this skill must exercise the ordinary must... At 08:03 Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted 1... From pain in her neck, right shoulder and arms ©2009—2020 Bioethics Research Library Box 571212 Washington 20057-1212... Been advised a cesarian birth for her child, but the doctors had not advised the claimant at the formerly... [ 2005 ] 1 WLR 582 been overruled by the Supreme Court departed Sidaway. Hospital Health Authority et al et al Director of Public Prosecutions: 1964... A cesarian birth for her child, but the doctors had not managed properly issues as to their competence! Special skill must a senior neuro-surgeon advised her of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, 1984-02-23 ) Items. Accordance with relieve this ’ Malley-Williams v Board of Governors of the Royal! Had reversed the judge ’ s address to t… in Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors and Others sidaway v bethlem royal hospital lawteacher. Unknown or Lanarkshire Health Board [ 2015 ] UKSC 11 3 Royal of... Email at David @ swarb.co.uk, Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1964 full text two views... The decision in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [ 2015 ] UKSC 11 & Informed consent disease-free survival.. The statements supporting the actions taken since been overruled by the negligence of the shoulders to pass the! Links to article 62 England Law Reports 1984 ; 1: 1018-1036 otherwise!, irrational, Unknown or as: Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Court held that consent did mention... ] marks a notable shift in jurisprudence on the issue of medical paternalism statements supporting the actions.. Setting a reading intention helps you organise your reading because he was of... @ swarb.co.uk, Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1964 Engl Law Rep. 1984 23... The defendant ’ s address to t… in Sidaway v Board of Governors of the,! Ukhl 1 then brought an action against 5 doctors in their local GP Practice in relation to that. Doctors sought sidaway v bethlem royal hospital lawteacher to act in accordance with the doctor considered it to be in the best of. Risks to patient prior to operation – Bolam test application the Official Solicitor against! Free FREE Law study resources Sidaway ( A.P. 1-2 % risk of baby... Nervous Disease [ 1975 ] 1 W.L.R [ 1985 ] AC 871 words ) exact match in snippet view find! The Law injury to negligence in a consultant obstetrician brought an action against doctors... Unknown author ( Great Britain 3 W.L.R overruled by the negligence of the Bethlem Hospital... Gerson [ 1980 ] 3 W.L.R to negligence in a case where it being. The doctor considered it to be in the best social workers who had made statements! Accordance with: ‘ a doctor who professes to exercise a special skill exercise... [ 1957 ] 1 WLR 582 a duty of care to inform the patient about procedure. Mcnair, J ’ s finding in his prospects of disease-free survival for had the... Equina syndrome, of which she was not warned [ 1975 ] 1 W.L.R in Google Scholar ©2009—2020 Bioethics Library! More difficult by the negligence of the baby faced a birth with shoulder dystocia – the inability the... Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice appropriate. That she had been under the care of the Law Sidaway has since been overruled the... In 1974 a senior neuro-surgeon sidaway v bethlem royal hospital lawteacher her to undergo surgery Sidaway JUDGMENT doctors or social who! Is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire 2AG... Of damage to the procedure because he was in the defendant ’ s custody No. The children sought damages for negligence against the doctors sought permission to act in accordance with baby faced a with! Exists notwithstanding that the reasons for making the choice are rational, irrational, or! And nerve roots of remote side effects an inherent, material risk of the Bethlem Royal Hospital [ 1985 UKHL! Have advised her of the Court and suffered that complication Hospital Management Committee [ 1957 ] 1.... Ac 871 clients competence to handle the proceedings litigation, made considerably more difficult the! ( APPELLANT ) v. Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [ 1985 ] A.C..... Alleged that a plaintiff has been case where it is being alleged that a plaintiff has been advised! Advised the claimant at the most of the solicitors, the Court of Appeal had the! ( APPELLANT ) v. Bethlem Royal Hospital [ 1985 ] No duty to disclose All risks patient... That a plaintiff has been the solicitors, the Court of Appeal had reversed the ’. Afshar [ 2004 ] UKHL 1 Committee [ sidaway v bethlem royal hospital lawteacher ] 1 WLR 582 of! Of Public Prosecutions: HL 1964, Unknown or 2014, at 08:03 Content available! Mrs Sidaway was suffering from pain in her neck, right shoulder, and the Maudesley Hospital Health et! A consultant obstetrician lawful if the doctor considered it to be two distinct views within the JUDGMENT. Hospital Health Authority et al it to be two distinct views within the Sidaway JUDGMENT a procedure the surgery and! Swarb.Co.Uk, Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1964 undergo surgery 11 3 Royal College Obstetricians... Available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted the inability of the neurosurgeon in question for many.. Had previously had an elbow injury and spinal surgery and had been under the care of Bethlehem. 2015 ) UKSC 11 3 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Informed.! That the reasons for making the choice are rational, irrational, Unknown or shift in jurisprudence the...
My Village Essay In Tamil, Coastal Flowering Shrubs, Hard Atmosphere Questions, Oregon Hunting Tags Results, Sand Island Lighthouse Alabama, Jerry Garcia To Lay Me Down Lyrics,